home Mail List
Info
Info
Meetings
Goals
Upcoming
Projects
FAQ
Security
Links

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

[NMLUG] RAID5 - ATA vs SATA


  • Subject: [NMLUG] RAID5 - ATA vs SATA
  • From: timothyemerick at yahoo.com (Tim Emerick)
  • Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:40:21 -0000

I've been contemplating converting my 2 disk raid1 to a 4 disk raid5.  Couple of questions to those in the know.

Machine: Intel P4 1.5Ghz Stepping 02, 512meg ram, 2-WD 80GB UDMA/100 raid1 mirror using debian testing.

Usage: General office/campus use as a samba file server.  About 150 PC's connected to it with maybe 20-30 users max performing simultaneous read/writes.  Activity is mostly database type with small read/writes.  Others are accessing office type documents.

With a 4 disk raid5 array (safety matters ya know).  Will I notice a huge difference in read/write speed from what I have now or just nominal?

Does SATA vs ATA make a big difference?

I'm pretty sure the bottleneck at this point is the sluggish disk access but how can I verify that it's the disks and not a saturated network connection?  I've been using a utility called bwm-ng to monitor bandwidth and have not seen it come close to the 100mb/s that my NIC is rated.

Thanks for any insights.

Tim Emerick


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.nmlug.org/pipermail/nmlug/attachments/20061201/5b7588fe/attachment.html 




Please send sugestions and comments to webmaster@nmlug.org.
Valid XHTML 1.1! Valid CSS! Powered by Debian Powered by Apache