[NMLUG] Re: consulting work available (Robert Delahunt)

[lpotts at swcp.com (Leila Potts)]

Wesley J Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> said:

> 
> On Thursday 27 May 2004 3:19 pm, Peter Espen wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 May 2004, Robert Delahunt wrote:
> > > First response:
> > > > From: Mike Garfias <mike@garfias.org>
> > > > Jeez.  Who pissed in your wheaties?
> > >
> > > Sorry, it says so in the Linux Advocacy FAQ.  I did not mean to
> > > sound demeaning or angry, because I'm not.  I help out in IRC and
> > > hear it there too.  I am only politely correcting this, since it's
> > > not right to use demeaning nicknames for Windows any more than it's
> > > right for them to do the same.  We might not like Windows, but
> > > we're using Linux by choice.  We need to be good examples of what
> > > computing and community can be, as much as is humanly possible.  If
> > > it's venting, people can vent in IRC.
> >
> > 1. Please supply a URL or reference to the "Linux Advocacy FAQ"
> 
> Here is one (the first match on google for "linux advocacy FAQ"):=20
> <http://www.softpanorama.org/OSS/bad_linux_advocacy_faq.shtml>. It's=20
> pretty much just a big rant, focused on antimosity towards ESR, mostly.
> 
> Also,=20
> <http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue14/advocate.html>, which refers to=20
> itself as the "Linux Advocacy HOWTO" in it's User Groups guidelines.=20
> Most of the guidelines aren't bad, and are pretty common-sense. I don't=20
> agree with all of them, however.
> 
> Both seem completely tangential to important issues, like *freedom*,=20
> which strikes me as a bit odd.
> 
> =2D-=20
> Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net>
> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094  0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
> 


Just curious, but if I only run FreeBSD am I still bound by the Linux Advocacy
FAQ and HOWTO?