









|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[NMLUG] Further advamtage of GHOST
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:26:26 -0700, you wrote:
>James Hamilton wrote:
>
>>>What else are you gonna use if you need to clone a Mac OS X 10.3 file or
>>>partition? Ghost sure can't do it. Oh, by the way, Ghost can't even
>>>do reiserfs.
>>
>> Tar damn it tar! ;-) There's unix in them there hills...
>
>So, if someone (not me) was slick enough to create a ncurses or/and
>graphical UI to do fdisk and tar, you then would have a GhC (ghost
>clone) that far outpaced Ghost (GhC+), and would not only allow you to
>move your files from one device to another (device independence), and
>resize partitions, but ALSO let you migrate between file systems....
>theoretically.
>
>Now, you'd have to leave all your journals behind, but you're likely
>going to have to do that in the best-case scenario anyway. Are there
>other implications in "ghosting" journaled file systems that I'm not
>aware of?
>
>Oh, oh, and instead of calling it GhC+, we could call it "Advamtage!"
>
>Whoot!
>
>Okay, what did I miss? I know I missed something (other than who's
>going to build this bad boy).
My transfer speed tests comparing Ghost and <dd>, ATA100, single CPU,
indicate equivalent results limited by the other hardware in the
system, not the software.
Steve
Stephen B. Browne
sbrowne@ix.netcom.com
"Ubi bene, ibi patria."
|
|