









|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[NMLUG] Re: M$ SFU v3.5 vs Cygwin
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:47:17 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>P.S. I just bid on a project for Medical transcription (bulk word
>processing at its most basic). Their specs?
>
>* Basic networking
>* WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS (they provide this)
>* Support for LaserJet 3's
>* DOS no windows
>
>I asked them about their simple requiremnts and why they opted for WP 5.1
>DOS, especially. Their answer, they have yet to find a Windows system that
>could keep up with their typists.
You mean Wordstar isn't good enough? ;-)
Steve
Stephen B. Browne
sbrowne@ix.netcom.com
"Ubi bene, ibi patria."
|
|