









|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[NMLUG] Re: M$ SFU v3.5 vs Cygwin
- Subject: [NMLUG] Re: M$ SFU v3.5 vs Cygwin
- From: neosad1st at charter.net (Robert)
- Date: Sun Feb 1 12:46:12 2004
> Just downloaded and installed M$ SFU (Services for Unix).
> (Hey don't shoot me, it is now a free download after all...)
> Firstly, I must say that I was impressed with the features it now
> has - most importantly better NFS/NIS integration. I also see
> they are now bundling what looks to be a complete X11 system
> (this wasn't in the ancient version that I had)
I won't shoot you in the first place.
First off, do not refer to Microsoft as M$. That is unprofessional for
someone who chose Unix/Linux over the norm.
As to what they're bundling, I'm hoping we don't see a Microsoft version of
Linux any time soon. Given Microsoft's tendencies, it's highly possible IMO.
I hope the open source people start filing restraining orders against
Microsoft, or something. I don't hate microsoft, but I do hate how they
steal something and make it their own, yet their version sucks. But people
don't realize this, since it comes bundled with windows. Examples of this
are realplayer/winamp versus media player (now people hardly remember those
products), netscape versus internet explorer, etc. Us Linux/Unix people
remember those products, as they've turned their attention to Linux/Unix. If
not for that, no one would remember them unless they were around at the time.
While Microsoft may be afraid of Linux/Unix now, I'm afraid they'll do
something to squash their competition, as has happened many times before. I
don't hate Microsoft -- I chose Linux for what it is and what I needed. But
I hate Microsoft's history, and I'm surprised people are so blind to their
actions in the past.
--
"We hold these truths to be self-evident:
that all men are created equal,
and are endowed by their CREATOR with certain unalienable rights...."
|
|