|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[NMLUG] Fwd: bounced email
Again, to those that actually host their own SMTP server, this extreme
approach would seem draconian. I fully appreciate their position and can
understand their actions. I'm also appreciative of the fact that they will
unblock your port 25 upon request. Much better position than when I had
Qwest DSL/MSN.
Tim
--- Ken Long <KenGLong@comcast.net> wrote:
> Just my opinion but...
>
> Blocking all port 25 usage except to the ISPs servers is an extreme
> move that is done only by lazy ISPs. I can fully understand and support
> blocking all direct email transmissions from non-business cable modem
> customers but many people do send through smtp servers other than the
> ones provided by the ISP and blocking all port 25 use seems
> unreasonable to me.
>
> Ken Long
> Albuquerque
>
> On 6 Dec 2004 at 10:42, Tim Emerick wrote:
>
> > CableOne in Rio Rancho actually blocks all port 25 traffic. I just use
> their
> > SMTP servers to relay and all is well with me. It's only the techie
> geeks
> > (like us) that actually look at SMTP headers anyway.
> >
> > Tim
> > --- Kevin Rosenberg <kevin@rosenberg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > James Hamilton wrote:
> > > > Comcast has requested this ip range be blocked, see
> > >
> > > Yes, I had the same issue with trying to send email directly from my
> > > Comcast ip address -- mail was being blocked by several destination
> > > mail server. So, I switched to SWCP DSL and the problem is gone.
> > >
> > > Kevin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NMLUG mailing list
> NMLUG@nmlug.org
> http://www.nmlug.org/mailman/listinfo/nmlug
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com
|
|
